We might suggest, as always, that the support group watch Carla with care and make the decision based upon observation. It is not within our capacity to specifically recommend a future decision. We would note that our previous recommendation of one working on alternate diurnal periods did not take into account the fragility of Carla and thus we would ask your forgiveness for this suggestion. At this nexus our distortion is towards a flexible scheduling of workings based upon, as we said, the support group’s decisions concerning Carla. We would again note that there is a fine line between the care of Carla for continued use which we find acceptable and the proper understanding, if you will excuse this misnomer, of the entire group’s need to work in service. Thus if Carla’s condition is truly marginal, by all means let more rest occur between workings. However, if there is desire for the working and Carla is at all able in your careful opinion, it is, shall we say, a well done action for this group to work. We cannot be more precise, for this contact is a function of your free will.